China: Uyghur academic faces execution
Tashpolat Tiyip receives an honorary doctorate from the Sorbonne in November 2008 © Nury Teyip
Fears are mounting that the Chinese authorities will imminently carry out the execution of Tashpolat Tiyip. He is a prominent Uyghur academic who was convicted in a secret and grossly unfair trial. He has been arbitrarily detained since he was subjected to an enforced disappearance in 2017. His current whereabouts remain unknown.
Tashpolat Tiyip was the President of Xinjiang University when he was forcibly disappeared two years ago while travelling to Germany with a group of students for a conference. He was convicted of “separatism” in secret and grossly unfair proceedings and sentenced to a “suspended death sentence”. While this includes the possibility of commutation after two years’ imprisonment if no other crimes are committed, he now also faces the possibility of imminent execution.
Please send a fax, email or letter to the president.
- Express concern at reports that former president of Xinjiang University Tashpolat Tiyip is at risk of imminent execution.
- Urge him to immediately halt plans to carry out the execution of the Uyghur academic.
- Call on him to release Tashpolat Tiyip unconditionally, unless there is enough credible and admissible evidence that he committed an internationally recognized offence and is granted a fair trial in line with international standards.
President of the People’s Republic of China, Xi Jinping
Xichengqu, Beijing Shi 100017
People’s Republic of China
Fax: 011 86 10 6238 1025
Email: email@example.com (If your email is returned, please choose an alternate method.)
Salutation: Dear President
Ms. Mingjian Chen
Chargé d'Affaires, Embassy of the People's Republic of China
515 St. Patrick Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5H3
Fax: 613 789 1911
Phone: 613 789 3434 or 613 762 3769
Uyghurs are a mainly Muslim ethnic minority who are concentrated primarily in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (Xinjiang) in China. Since the 1980s, the Uyghurs have been the target of systematic and extensive human rights violations. This includes arbitrary detention and imprisonment, incommunicado detention, and restrictions on religious freedom as well as cultural and social rights. Local authorities maintain tight control over religious practice, including prohibiting all government employees and children under the age of 18 from worshiping at mosques. Chinese government policies limit the use of the Uyghur language, impose severe restrictions on freedom of religion and encourage sustained influx of Han migrants into the region.
In May 2014, a one-year “strike hard” campaign was launched in Xinjiang, and officials prioritized speedy arrests, quick trials and mass sentencing of Uyghurs. The government called for greater “co-operation” between prosecuting authorities and courts, raising additional concerns that accused individuals would not receive fair trials. The “strike hard” campaign has been extended in the subsequent years, and the authorities have massively increased their expenditure on police. Under such circumstances, many Uyghurs make the decision to flee the country. The Chinese authorities have responded by harassing the relatives of those who have left in order to pressure them to return and increasing attempts to curtail the political and human rights activities of Uyghur activists in other countries. This has led to growing fears among many Uyghurs abroad, including asylum seekers and refugees, of being forcibly returned to China. In recent years, dozens of Uyghur asylum seekers have been forcibly returned from South East Asian or Central Asian countries, to China.
Media reports illustrated the extent of the new draconian security measures implemented since Chen Quanguo came into power as Xinjiang’s Party Secretary in 2016, including over 90,000 new security-related positions being advertised within a one-year period. In October 2016, there were numerous reports that authorities in the region had confiscated Uyghur passports in an attempt to further curtail their freedom of movement. In March 2017, the Xinjiang government enacted the “De-extremification Regulation” that identifies and prohibits a wide range of behaviours labelled “extremist”, such as “spreading extremist thought”, denigrating or refusing to watch public radio and TV programs, wearing burkas, having an “abnormal” beard, resisting national policies, and publishing, downloading, storing, or reading articles, publications, or audio-visual materials containing “extremist content”. The regulation also set up a “responsibility system” for government cadres for “anti-extremism” work and established annual reviews of their performance. According to Radio Free Asia (RFA), Chinese authorities compelled Uyghur students enrolled in universities abroad to return to China since May 2017. In early July 2017, about 200 Uyghurs were detained in Egypt by order of the Chinese authorities, with 16 who have been forcibly returned have not been heard from since.
The Chinese authorities had denied the existence of “transformation through-education” facilities until October 2018. When acknowledging the camps, they described them as voluntary, free “vocational training” centres. They claim that the objective of this vocational training is to provide the people with technical and vocational education to enable them to find jobs and become “useful” citizens. China’s explanation, however, contradicts the reports of beatings, food deprivation and solitary confinement we have collected from former detainees.
Amnesty International has also remained concerned about the secretive use of the death penalty in Xinjiang, in the context of the increased security measures in the “strike hard” campaigns. Such campaigns have typically been associated with the increased use of the death penalty, and scholars have criticized the proceedings used as part of these crackdowns for their lack of fair trial safeguards and the likelihood of “wrongful executions”.
An in-depth investigation published by Amnesty International in April 2017, China’s Deadly Secrets, shows that despite claims by China that it is making progress towards transparency in the criminal justice system, Chinese authorities enforce an elaborate secrecy system to obfuscate the extent of executions. This investigation found hundreds of executions in public media reports are missing from a national online court database, “China Judgments Online”, even though such case should be uploaded according to Chinese regulations. This was also particularly relevant to death penalty cases relating to the Xinjiang region.
Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases and under any circumstances, as a violation of the right to life and the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment. The organization has been campaigning for global abolition of the death penalty for over 40 years.
If you want Updates on this case, send your request to firstname.lastname@example.org with “Keep me updated on UA 119/19 China” in the subject line.