DOWNLOAD A PDF OF UA 83/22 BELOW
On 1 June, the President Kais Saied arbitrarily dismissed 57 judges and prosecutors on vague grounds that included obstructing terrorism-related investigations, financial corruption, “moral corruption,” “adultery”, and participation in “alcohol-fueled parties.” On 10 August, the Tunis Administrative Tribunal issued an emergency ruling ordering the reinstatement of 49 of the 57 magistrates, but the government has thus far failed to comply with the tribunal decision. The Ministry of Justice must immediately reinstate all arbitrarily removed judges and prosecutors and respect the tribunal’s decision.
In the Tunis Administrative Tribunal’s ruling on the cases of the 49 judges and prosecutors on 10 August, the tribunal found that the government had “made the contested decision without informing the judges of the allegations against them, which is a serious breach of defense rights, the presumption of innocence and fair trial guarantees set forth in the Tunisian constitution and laws.” The tribunal further stated that the dismissal amounts to a “Damocles sword for judges, undermines the independence of the judiciary …and seriously violates their reputation and right to work….”
Among the 49 judges and prosecutors, whose dismissal was suspended by the administrative tribunal, are Hamadi Rahmani, magistrate counselor at the Court of Cassation; Mohamed Taher Kanzari, juvenile affairs judge in the Court of Siliana; and Ramzi Bahria, assistant prosecutor in the Mahdia First Instance Tribunal. On 22 June, the three went on hunger strike (Hamadi Rahmani and Ramzi Bahria for 15 days and Mohamed Taher Kanzari for 36 days) to protest their arbitrary dismissal. They told Amnesty International that the Ministry of Justice had not at any point informed them of the grounds for their dismissal and they had not had access to review any official document or evidence against them or challenge it. All three said they were shocked when they heard the news of their dismissal which they learned through social media or colleagues. The authorities did not provide them with a written reasoned decision, access to their disciplinary or judicial files to review any evidence against them, or a means of appeal the denial of these rights. The dismissed judges and prosecutors have been denied their right to work, and have been without their salaries, and medical coverage for over three months.
Write to the Minister of Justice urging her to:
- immediately reinstate the judges and prosecutors arbitrarily dismissed as their revocation is an assault on the independence of the judiciary
Minister of Justice
31 Boulevard Bab Bnet, Tunis
Fax: 011 216 71 568 106
Salutation: Dear Minister of Justice:
His Excellency Mohamed Imed Torjemane
Embassy of the Republic of Tunisia
515 O’Connor Street
Ottawa, ON K1S 3P8
Fax: 613 237 7939
Since his power grab on 25 July 2021, President Kais Saied has launched repeated attacks on fair trial rights and the independence of the judiciary. On 1 June 2022, President Kais Saied issued Decree-Law 2022-35 giving himself the authority to summarily dismiss judges and prosecutors, based on reports by unspecified “relevant bodies” that they are a threat to “public security” or “the supreme interests of the country” and for acts that “impinge on the reputation, independence or proper functioning of the judiciary”. The same day he dismissed 57 judges whose names were published on the Official Gazette. He announced their dismissal on a videotaped speech citing accusations that included obstructing terrorism-related investigations, financial corruption, “moral corruption” and “adultery” among other misdeeds and later that day the names of 57 dismissed judges and prosecutors appeared in the Official Gazette.
This was not President Saied’s first attack on the judiciary. On 12 February 2022, he adopted Decree-Law 2022-11 in which he dissolved the High Judicial Council, a body of magistrates and legal, financial, tax and accounting experts elected mostly by their peers that was set up after Tunisia’s 2011 revolution to supervise the judiciary and shield it from interference by the executive branch. President Saied replaced the Council with a temporary body, partly appointed by him, and granted himself powers in the same Decree-Law to intervene in the appointment, career tracks and dismissal of judges and prosecutors.
On 14 August 2022, the Tunis Administrative Tribunal issued its emergency decision finding that 49 of the 57 judges and prosecutors arbitrarily dismissed should be reinstated immediately in their jobs. The tribunal’s decision in favour of the judges and prosecutors is not subject to appeal and should be enforced immediately according to article 41 of Law n.72-40 on the Administrative Tribunal. Yet, the Ministry of Justice has thus far refused to comply with the decision. Nearly a month after the tribunal’s decision, the judges and prosecutors have not been reinstated, in complete disregard of the court ruling and the rule of law.
Subsequent to the Administrative Tribunal’s decision, on 14 August, the Ministry of Justice issued a statement on its Facebook page stating that the judges revoked by Decree-Law 2022-35 on 1 June were being investigated in criminal proceedings. On 20 August, the Ministry of Justice issued a second statement giving more details on the criminal proceedings initiated against them saying the public prosecution seized 109 files related to financial and economic crimes as well as terrorism crimes among others. However, according to one of the lawyers of the 57 judges interviewed by Amnesty International, none of them were officially notified of the judicial proceedings against them and they still have no access to their files in those proceedings. The Ministry of Justice should in any case reinstate the judges, and in the event of credible allegations of wrongdoings that amount to serious misconduct or criminal offences, only initiate disciplinary or judicial proceedings against them in full compliance with international standards.
The United Nations Human Rights Committee, the body of experts who provide the definitive interpretation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which is binding on Tunisia, in their clarification of the state obligation to ensure the right to a fair trial (General Comment 32) has stressed: “Judges may be dismissed only on serious grounds of misconduct or incompetence, in accordance with fair procedures ensuring objectivity and impartiality set out in the constitution or the law. The dismissal of judges by the executive, e.g., before the expiry of the term for which they have been appointed, without any specific reasons given to them and without effective judicial protection being available to contest the dismissal is incompatible with the independence of the judiciary.”
According to the Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Fair trial and Legal Assistance in Africa, adopted by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights in 2005, “[judicial] officials facing disciplinary, suspension or removal proceedings shall be entitled to guarantees of a fair hearing including the right to be represented by a legal representative of their choice and to an independent review of decisions of disciplinary, suspension or removal proceedings.”
If you want Updates on this case, send your request to email@example.com with “Keep me updated on UA 83/22” in the subject line.